What details must be included for the commission to handle complaints of alleged violations?

To effectively handle complaints of alleged violations, the commission requires comprehensive information. This includes the full names of the parties involved, transaction details, and any pertinent documents that can substantiate the claims made. Providing detailed information is essential as it enables the commission to conduct a thorough investigation into the complaint. The full names ensure that there is clarity on who the parties involved are, while transaction details offer context regarding the nature of the complaint, helping the commission understand the specifics of the situation. Additionally, pertinent documents can serve as evidence to validate or refute the allegations, ensuring the complaint is handled judiciously and fairly.

In contrast, other options do not meet the necessary level of detail required for such complaints. Simply stating the type of violation does not provide adequate context for investigation. Anonymous tips, while useful in certain scenarios, lack accountability and details that may be critical for a proper inquiry. A basic complaint description might not include enough information to allow the commission to effectively address and resolve the issue at hand. Therefore, the requirement for comprehensive details ensures that complaints are handled in a systematic and informed manner.